The future of education starts here...

Just two days ago, a non-scheduled Jeju Air flight (JJA2216), en route from Bangkok to Muan, encountered a bird strike incident, resulting in a fatal crash. While an official investigation is still underway, it is clear from the pilot's mayday transmission that the collision with birds played a significant role in the incident. This serious situation underscores the critical importance of maintaining vigilance in the skies—not only in monitoring regular air traffic but also in safeguarding against wildlife hazards.

photo: Jeju Air 2216 before it crashed

A rare and tragic occurance

The accident sparked a significant public reaction in both Thailand and Korea, with many eager to share accusations and theories.

While it is natural for such a disaster to evoke strong emotions, ranging from grief to anger, it's important to remember that sharing opinions—especially in the immediate aftermath—can be harmful to survivors and the families of the victims. Furthermore, premature comments before an official investigation is completed may have unintended economic consequences.

Incidents like this one can also trigger fear and panic within the broader community, potentially leading people to alter their travel plans. It's crucial to understand that, while bird strikes are not particularly uncommon, they are still quite rare as the cause of major crashes.


Known facts (official incident report pending)

The tragic crash of the 737-800 has become one of the most devastating events in modern aviation history. Of the 1,474 reported incidents involving the 737-800 type, only 13 have involved fatalities, for a total of 1,100 deaths. However, this particular accident stands out not only as the deadliest of 2024 but also as the worst air disaster in South Korean history, excluding wartime casualties. The crash accounted for nearly 47.5% of all global fatalities linked to airliner crashes in 2023 and 2024.


How the events unfolded

At approximately 08:57, Muan Tower issued a bird activity warning. Just two minutes later, the flight crew declared a "mayday" over the radio, announcing the bird strike and attempting a go-around. The pilots’ decision was later confirmed by inspection findings, which revealed blood and feathers at the site of the hull impact, ruling out cognitive bias from the warning.

Despite successfully completing the go-around, the aircraft’s landing gear could not be extended, severely hindering its ability to land safely. With 181 passengers and crew on board, only two survivors emerged from the wreckage—both crew members. One of the survivors was seated in the tail section, likely contributing to their survival given the impact dynamics.

The aircraft ultimately landed from the opposite end of the runway, a critical deviation from the original landing plan. The absence of landing gear left the plane unable to brake effectively. As it skidded across the runway, friction caused significant smoke and sparks, but it was insufficient to halt the plane before it crashed into an embankment at the runway’s end. The collision resulted in a catastrophic explosion, marking the final moments of a tragic event.

infographic showing the timeline of the incident

Concluding remarks

This incident is a stark reminder of the unpredictable risks involved in aviation and the devastating impact of a combination of factors—ranging from bird strikes to equipment failure. The loss of so many lives, especially in such a high-profile accident, highlights the importance of continuing to improve safety measures and responses in aviation.