The case for using technology in class
Being successful as a teacher means finding ways to
help your students learn. Choosing good technology that
is appropriate for the lesson is something positive you
can do to facilitate this important mission.
Possibly the most important lesson from the OECD PISA
survey1 is that we should not try to cram
technology into our lessons just because it is
available.
In fact, a surprising finding of the survey was that,
contrary to popular expectations, students who did not
use computers in math lessons achieved higher
scores in mathematics examinations than those who did.
'The Economist' accurately predicts the coming storm.
One possible reason for this unexpected result is that
the typical math teacher does not receive sufficient
technology training to enable them to make the best
choices about which technologies are best suited to a
specific activity.
If you are a math teacher, you may be thinking that the
easiest way to interpret this finding is that you should
avoid the use of computers in teaching your classes. But
as usual the easiest interpretation is not always the
best one.
Keep in mind that the reason for students scoring higher
in exams when not using computers in the classroom was
not due to any flaw in the technology itself. The flaw
believed to be causing the differences is in the amount
of technology training teachers are receiving before
attempting to incorporate technology into their lessons.
Receiving more technology training will enable teachers
to make informed decisions about the technology they
choose to make use of.
The worst outcomes can be expected in situations where
teachers are required to incorporate certain
technologies into their lessons, yet are not provided
with any training in how to do so. In these situations,
teachers face an unfair disadvantage, and student
performance can be expected to suffer as a result.
Students will learn best when their lessons are
stimulating and engaging. Computers can offer two
important advantages for teachers to facilitate these
qualities in the lessons they teach.
The first of these advantages is
interactivity.
Students can test theoretical solutions by interacting
with the computer, and in so doing, an experiential
quality is imparted to the learning outcome.
The second advantage is computers can provide virtually
instant access to a worldwide pool of expert knowledge.
While it is important for teachers to ensure the
resources consulted are authoritative and accessible
(in this context, accessible means not only that it
accommodates those with disabilities, but also that it
is written in an audience-appropriate style).